ADA Litigation Triage for Defense Counsel
Turn an ADA Complaint
into a Claim-by-Claim
Technical Review
Upload a complaint. Get a structured technical evidence review matching each allegation against the live website in minutes. See which claims appear weak, which need attention, and what to investigate further.
INFORMATION FOR EVALUATION PURPOSES ONLY — DOES NOT CONSTITUTE FORMAL LEGAL REPRESENTATION OR UPL COUNSEL. TDARI IS AN AI-DRIVEN TECHNICAL FORENSIC PLATFORM. FULL SYSTEM JURISDICTION LIMITATIONS →
BUILT FOR DEFENSE COUNSEL
Technical Standards & Methodology
How We Build Your Review
Built for Defense Workflows
Designed to support documentation workflows commonly requested by defense counsel and insurers.
Secure Processing
Documents processed in isolated sessions. No complaint data retained after report generation.
Insurer-Compatible Output
Report format designed to align with documentation commonly requested by liability insurers.
Docket Analytics
380+ federal dockets mapped. Cross-checked with real-time plaintiff litigation trends.
How It Works
Upload a complaint. TDARI extracts each specific allegation, checks it against the live website, and delivers a claim-by-claim technical review.
Complaint Parsing
Upload a PDF or paste complaint text. The system identifies each specific accessibility allegation, the cited WCAG criteria, the target pages, and the claimed impact — automatically.
Live Website Verification
Each page and element cited in the complaint is visited and checked against the live website. The system captures what's actually there today so you can compare it against what the plaintiff claims.
Technical Review Report
Each allegation gets a verdict: refuted, confirmed, not found, or inconclusive. You see the evidence, what was checked, and what needs further investigation — all in a downloadable report.
What You Get: Technical Review Report
TDARI produces structured, downloadable technical review reports designed for defense workflow. Each report covers every allegation, shows what was found, and flags what needs attorney review.
Executive Summary & Risk Appraisal
Detailed litigation threat profiles, claimant historical patterns, and clear, risk-weighted strategic summaries for trial attorneys and general liability insurers.
Signed DOM Evidence Snapshots
Standards-compliant cryptographic DOM audits. Snapshots are written directly to Google Cloud Storage (GCS) and signed with secure SHA-256 hashes to guarantee evidence authenticity.
Paragraph-by-Paragraph Technical Rebuttals
Actionable code-level analysis disproving allegations of non-compliance. Real-world validation (ARIA-labels, semantic structural code tags) presented as clear court exhibit pages.
SOVEREIGN LITIGATION FORENSIC EVIDENCE BINDER
// ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED
"Paragraph 14: Defendant denies all claims of link non-descriptiveness. Factual evidence dossier exhibits verified compliance markup including standard-compliant ARIA label hooks..."
Experience Case Dissection In Real-Time
Click below to simulate how our forensic multi-agent engine automatically refutes vague, boilerplated allegations in under 5 seconds.
"Plaintiff attempted to access the Defendant's website utilizing screen-reading software. However, Plaintiff was blocked from navigating the home page because the primary image logo lacks a text alternative ('alt' attribute), rendering the entire visual navigation menu completely inaccessible to blind patrons in violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act."
troubleshoot The Defendant's Actual Code state:
<img class="logo" src="/img/brand.svg" aria-label="Company Home">
Note: The lawsuit asserts that the image lacks an 'alt' attribute, yet it is fully accessible to assistive technologies via the modern aria-label attribute. A classic automated scanner false-positive.
Synthesis Complete
Confidential Defense Dossier
Plaintiff Tactic
Boilerplate Complaint
Legal Resolution
Refuted via Modern ARIA
Indexed Precedents
42 Matching Claims
Evidence Package
Cryptographic DOM Hash
Fact refutation complete. Documented that the target element <img class="logo"> has a valid aria-label attribute providing screen-readers with full textual alternative, rendering Plaintiff's complaint allegation completely false.
Core Evidentiary Artifacts Synthesized
TDARI doesn't just offer AI suggestions. We provide concrete, legally defensible, cryptographically verified materials for trial counsel.
Confidential Defense Dossier (PDF)
Our master deliverable: a highly structured, paragraph-by-paragraph refutation of the lawsuit. Fully referenced and integrated with actual court dockets, plaintiff lawyer profiles, and previous settlement histories.
- check_circle Paragraph-by-paragraph factual refutation
- check_circle Plaintiff lawyer boilerplate analysis
- check_circle Settlement valuation and precedent range
Cryptographic DOM Affidavits
We capture and seal your client website's raw DOM with standardized cryptographic hashing. Files are securely decoupled and written directly to GCS to avoid index limits, proving the site's exact state in court.
- check_circle Secure Base64 DOM transit via Extension
- check_circle Decoupled storage written directly to GCS
- check_circle Signed SHA-256 cryptographic verification
12-Hour Amber SLA & HITL
If security walls (WAF/Cloudflare) block automated crawlers, our deterministic pre-flight validator instantly triggers an Amber State. A human-in-the-loop (HITL) operator handles DOM capture within a strict 12-hour SLA.
- check_circle Automatic Cloudflare block pre-flight check
- check_circle Google Chat active ticket dispatch
- check_circle Human-in-the-loop manual capture
Litigation Pulse
Live FeedNelson Fernandez v. [Name Withheld for Privacy]
District Court, M.D. Florida
Victor Lopez, On Behalf Of Himself And All Other Persons Similarly Situated, v. [Name Withheld for Privacy]
District Court, S.D. New York
Raymond T. Mahlberg, Plaintiff, v. [Name Withheld for Privacy]
District Court, M.D. Florida
Milagros Senior, On Behalf Of Herself And All Other Persons Similarly Situated, v. [Name Withheld for Privacy]
District Court, S.D. New York
Frank Senior v. [Name Withheld for Privacy]
District Court, S.D. New York
public Federal Jurisdictions
Browse Active Federal Dockets
Explore filing volume activity and detailed court archives across the most active accessibility jurisdictions in the United States.
NY
New York
Risk index based on public PACER filings in New York federal courts. This does not constitute legal advice.
Total Cases
773
Triage Score
98
FL
Florida
Risk index based on public PACER filings in Florida federal courts. This does not constitute legal advice.
Total Cases
1,923
Triage Score
85
CA
California
Risk index based on public PACER filings in California federal courts. This does not constitute legal advice.
Total Cases
419
Triage Score
92