ADA Litigation Triage for Defense Counsel

Turn an ADA Complaint
into a Claim-by-Claim
Technical Review

Upload a complaint. Get a structured technical evidence review matching each allegation against the live website in minutes. See which claims appear weak, which need attention, and what to investigate further.

console.tdari.com/dashboard/case_sdny-1:26-cv-09842
tune help_outline
document_scanner COMPLAINT PARSER
analytics CLAIM ANALYSIS
gavel REVIEW REPORT
STATUS: REVIEW COMPLETE
CLAIMS ANALYZED: 28 of 28 Attorney Review Needed
Review Confidence
83% Viable
4 CRITICAL REBUTTALS VERIFIED
// Evidentiary Pipeline
Complaint Ingested & Parsed
Factual Site DOM Dissected
Certified Exhibit Dossier Sealed
// Active Allegations Refuted
No alternate text on branding logo
WCAG 1.1.1 Non-Text Content
Refuted (Spacer)
Non-descriptive anchor link labels
WCAG 2.4.4 Link Purpose
Secure (Aria Label)
DOM EXHIBIT VERIFICATION SHA-256 SECURED
01 <header class="site-nav">
02 <img class="logo" src="/img/spacer.png" role="presentation">
03 <a href="/" aria-label="Technical Defense Homepage">Home</a>
04 </header>

INFORMATION FOR EVALUATION PURPOSES ONLY — DOES NOT CONSTITUTE FORMAL LEGAL REPRESENTATION OR UPL COUNSEL. TDARI IS AN AI-DRIVEN TECHNICAL FORENSIC PLATFORM. FULL SYSTEM JURISDICTION LIMITATIONS →

BUILT FOR DEFENSE COUNSEL

description 380+ Cases Tracked
schedule Reports in ~10 Minutes
verified Live Website Verification
gavel Claim-by-Claim Analysis

Technical Standards & Methodology

How We Build Your Review

gavel

Built for Defense Workflows

Designed to support documentation workflows commonly requested by defense counsel and insurers.

security

Secure Processing

Documents processed in isolated sessions. No complaint data retained after report generation.

verified_user

Insurer-Compatible Output

Report format designed to align with documentation commonly requested by liability insurers.

analytics

Docket Analytics

380+ federal dockets mapped. Cross-checked with real-time plaintiff litigation trends.

How It Works

How It Works

Upload a complaint. TDARI extracts each specific allegation, checks it against the live website, and delivers a claim-by-claim technical review.

Step 01 // INTAKE folder_open

Complaint Parsing

Upload a PDF or paste complaint text. The system identifies each specific accessibility allegation, the cited WCAG criteria, the target pages, and the claimed impact — automatically.

Active Audit Lock Secure
Step 02 // CRAWL radar

Live Website Verification

Each page and element cited in the complaint is visited and checked against the live website. The system captures what's actually there today so you can compare it against what the plaintiff claims.

Timestamped Evidence Capture
Step 03 // SEAL verified

Technical Review Report

Each allegation gets a verdict: refuted, confirmed, not found, or inconclusive. You see the evidence, what was checked, and what needs further investigation — all in a downloadable report.

Downloadable PDF + HTML Report
folder_special Exclusively For Defense Counsel

What You Get: Technical Review Report

TDARI produces structured, downloadable technical review reports designed for defense workflow. Each report covers every allegation, shows what was found, and flags what needs attorney review.

analytics

Executive Summary & Risk Appraisal

Detailed litigation threat profiles, claimant historical patterns, and clear, risk-weighted strategic summaries for trial attorneys and general liability insurers.

fingerprint

Signed DOM Evidence Snapshots

Standards-compliant cryptographic DOM audits. Snapshots are written directly to Google Cloud Storage (GCS) and signed with secure SHA-256 hashes to guarantee evidence authenticity.

code_blocks

Paragraph-by-Paragraph Technical Rebuttals

Actionable code-level analysis disproving allegations of non-compliance. Real-world validation (ARIA-labels, semantic structural code tags) presented as clear court exhibit pages.

lock SECURED DOSSIER
balance

SOVEREIGN LITIGATION FORENSIC EVIDENCE BINDER

// ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED

TDARI FORENSIC CORP RECORD #26-09842
FORENSIC AUDIT PASSED
// WCAG Verification Standards
check_circle ARIA-label verification complete.
check_circle Structural document heading map correct.
check_circle Factual evidence DOM hash compiled.
Cryptographic Evidentiary Signature
SHA256: 8a73b9e2f...d39f4e2a
CONFIDENTIAL • VERIFICATION STANDARD V2.6
123456789101112131415
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
JOHN DOE,
Plaintiff,
v.
PRESTIGE BRAND INC.,
Defendant.
Docket No.
1:26-cv-09842
Defendant's Answer & Rebuttal

"Paragraph 14: Defendant denies all claims of link non-descriptiveness. Factual evidence dossier exhibits verified compliance markup including standard-compliant ARIA label hooks..."

SEALED DEFENSE DOSSIER EXHIBIT A
terminal Interactive Sandbox

Experience Case Dissection In Real-Time

Click below to simulate how our forensic multi-agent engine automatically refutes vague, boilerplated allegations in under 5 seconds.

description Sample Lawsuit Allegation Docket SDNY-1:26-cv-09842
¶ 14

"Plaintiff attempted to access the Defendant's website utilizing screen-reading software. However, Plaintiff was blocked from navigating the home page because the primary image logo lacks a text alternative ('alt' attribute), rendering the entire visual navigation menu completely inaccessible to blind patrons in violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act."

troubleshoot The Defendant's Actual Code state:

<img class="logo" src="/img/brand.svg" aria-label="Company Home">

Note: The lawsuit asserts that the image lacks an 'alt' attribute, yet it is fully accessible to assistive technologies via the modern aria-label attribute. A classic automated scanner false-positive.

gavel Forensic Objective: Identify False-Positive Evidence
TDARI_DISSECTION_ENGINE // ACTIVE_SANDBOX_CONSOLET
v4.2.1-LIVE
Ready for case evaluation. Click below to begin extraction pipeline...
Agent Engine Ready
inventory_2 System Deliverables

Core Evidentiary Artifacts Synthesized

TDARI doesn't just offer AI suggestions. We provide concrete, legally defensible, cryptographically verified materials for trial counsel.

picture_as_pdf

Confidential Defense Dossier (PDF)

Our master deliverable: a highly structured, paragraph-by-paragraph refutation of the lawsuit. Fully referenced and integrated with actual court dockets, plaintiff lawyer profiles, and previous settlement histories.

  • check_circle Paragraph-by-paragraph factual refutation
  • check_circle Plaintiff lawyer boilerplate analysis
  • check_circle Settlement valuation and precedent range
shield Attorney-Client Privilege Protected
fingerprint

Cryptographic DOM Affidavits

We capture and seal your client website's raw DOM with standardized cryptographic hashing. Files are securely decoupled and written directly to GCS to avoid index limits, proving the site's exact state in court.

  • check_circle Secure Base64 DOM transit via Extension
  • check_circle Decoupled storage written directly to GCS
  • check_circle Signed SHA-256 cryptographic verification
history Evidentiary Time-Locked
notifications_active

12-Hour Amber SLA & HITL

If security walls (WAF/Cloudflare) block automated crawlers, our deterministic pre-flight validator instantly triggers an Amber State. A human-in-the-loop (HITL) operator handles DOM capture within a strict 12-hour SLA.

  • check_circle Automatic Cloudflare block pre-flight check
  • check_circle Google Chat active ticket dispatch
  • check_circle Human-in-the-loop manual capture
timer 12-Hour SLA Guaranteed