Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Apparel Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed January 7, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 AAMislabeled UI ElementsScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation Failure

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an apparel retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on January 7, 2020. Represented by Roderick V. Hannah, ESQ., P.A. and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.A., the complaint alleges that the e-commerce website fails to provide full and equal access to visually disabled users.

The lawsuit specifically details several critical web content accessibility violations, including a mislabeled home button, menu functions that do not display options, site elements like sliders that lack proper screen reader labels, and missing descriptions for image content. Additionally, the website's design is criticized for sacrificing functionality with screen readers, leading to repetitive sales advertisements and difficulties for visually impaired individuals to access information and complete online forms.

This action highlights the ongoing legal risks faced by online retailers whose websites do not comply with ADA Title III and Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). Businesses operating e-commerce platforms must ensure their digital interfaces are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, or they may face similar litigation and demands for injunctive relief to implement comprehensive accessibility policies, training, and ongoing audits.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online apparel retailer accused of?

Mislabeled home button, site function like menu does not display options, site elements like slider are not labeled to integrate with the screen reader, missing descriptions for image content, and site design sacrificed functionality with the screen reader and sales ad repeats over and over.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

VICTOR ARIZA, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, ES

, P.

and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.

What legal risk does this create?

Businesses operating e-commerce websites face legal exposure under ADA Title III if their digital platforms are not fully accessible to disabled individuals, potentially leading to lawsuits demanding injunctive relief for accessibility improvements.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Apparel Retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer