Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online mattress and bedding retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed January 10, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureMissing Form LabelsMislabeled Links

Case Summary

Plaintiff Victor Ariza has filed a lawsuit against an online mattress and bedding retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on January 10, 2020. The complaint alleges that the defendant's website fails to comply with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), denying visually disabled individuals equal access to its online services and information.

The lawsuit details several alleged WCAG violations, including menu functions that do not display options, mislabeled links, unlabeled search options, and inconsistent site functionality with screen readers. Additionally, the website is accused of lacking prompting information and accommodations necessary for visually disabled users to accurately fill out online forms. The plaintiff also claims the website does not meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA guidelines and lacks an accessible 'Accessibility Notice' or comprehensive accessibility policy.

This case underscores the significant legal risks faced by online businesses that do not ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Such non-compliance can lead to lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, mandating extensive website modifications, and potentially requiring payment of attorney's fees and other costs, to achieve equal access under ADA Title III.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online mattress and bedding retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of several WCAG violations, including menu functions that do not display options, mislabeled links, unlabeled search options, and inconsistent site functionality with screen readers. Additionally, the website lacked necessary prompting information for visually disabled individuals to complete online forms and did not meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA guidelines.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by Victor Ariza, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the legal risk for online businesses that fail to ensure their digital platforms are accessible to individuals with disabilities, potentially leading to lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and significant changes to website design and operational policies under ADA Title III.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online mattress and be.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer