Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Clothing Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed February 7, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.0-AALabels or Instructions FailureTiming Adjustable IssuesKeyboard Navigation FailureFocus Order Violation

Case Summary

ARANTZA ESPINOZA has filed a lawsuit against an online clothing retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on February 7, 2020. The plaintiff, who is visually impaired, alleges that the defendant's e-commerce website is inaccessible to individuals with disabilities, preventing her from full and equal enjoyment of the site's services and merchandise under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The complaint specifically details several WCAG 2.0-AA compliance failures, including issues with "Labels or Instructions" (Standard 3.3.2 Level A), "Timing Adjustable" (Standard 2.2.1 Level A), "Keyboard" accessibility (Standard 2.1.1 Level A), and "Focus Order" (Standard 2.4.3 Level A). These alleged barriers, such as a lack of proper labeling for screen reader software and inadequate keyboard navigation, impede visually impaired users from engaging with the website's features, including purchasing products and accessing customer service.

This legal action highlights the ongoing necessity for online businesses, particularly e-commerce platforms, to ensure their digital presence meets ADA Title III accessibility standards. Businesses that fail to implement WCAG guidelines risk similar lawsuits, potential injunctions requiring website remediation, and damages, underscoring the importance of proactive digital accessibility measures to serve all customers.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online clothing retailer accused of?

The online clothing retailer is accused of violating WCAG 2.0-AA standards including 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions (Level A), 2.2.1 Timing Adjustable (Level A), 2.1.1 Keyboard (Level A), and 2.4.3 Focus Order (Level A).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

ARANTZA ESPINOZA filed this lawsuit, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for other online clothing retailers and e-commerce platforms that may not be fully compliant with ADA Title III and WCAG standards, potentially leading to similar lawsuits, demands for injunctive relief, and compensatory damages.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Clothing Retail.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer