Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Flooring and Home Décor Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed February 19, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

Missing Alt TextScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureAccessible LabelsWCAG 2.0 Level AA

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an online flooring and home décor retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on February 19, 2020. VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A., alleges that the defendant's website is inaccessible to visually disabled users due to numerous barriers preventing full and equal enjoyment of its services.

The complaint specifically details several WCAG violations, including a mislabeled home button, a navigation menu that is not accessible to screen readers, site design choices that sacrifice functionality for screen reader users, and mislabeled images. These technical deficiencies reportedly prevent visually impaired individuals, who rely on screen reader software, from effectively communicating with and utilizing the e-commerce website to access information, browse products, or make purchases.

This case highlights the ongoing legal risks for businesses operating e-commerce websites that fail to comply with ADA Title III requirements and WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards. Companies in similar industries must ensure their digital platforms provide equal access to all users, including those with visual disabilities, to avoid potential lawsuits and ensure compliance with federal accessibility laws.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online flooring and home décor retailer accused of?

The allegations include a mislabeled home button, a menu not accessible to screen readers, site design that sacrificed functionality with screen readers, and mislabeled images.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case illustrates the legal vulnerability for e-commerce businesses that fail to provide accessible online platforms, potentially leading to lawsuits under ADA Title III for discriminatory practices against disabled users.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Flooring and Home .... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer