Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a luxury goods retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 11, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAMissing Alt TextForm Field AccessibilityScreen Reader IncompatibilityUnlabeled UI Elements

Case Summary

Nelson Fernandez, a visually and physically disabled individual, filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online luxury goods retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on March 11, 2020. The complaint asserts that the retailer's website failed to provide equal access for disabled users, hindering their ability to browse merchandise, locate stores, and access promotions, thereby denying them full and equal enjoyment of services.

The lawsuit specifically alleges numerous WCAG violations including unlabeled site information such as phone numbers, mislabeled site functions like search buttons, missing descriptions for image content (alt text), and mislabeled color options. Furthermore, the plaintiff claims the e-commerce website lacked necessary prompting information for screen reader users to fill out online forms, did not display an accessibility notice or policy, and failed to meet Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA standards.

This legal action highlights the critical importance for all businesses operating digital platforms, especially those with a nexus to physical public accommodations, to ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Non-compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG standards can lead to significant legal exposure, requiring costly injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and modifications to digital interfaces to prevent ongoing discrimination.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this luxury goods retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of having unlabeled site information (e.g., phone numbers), mislabeled site functions (e.g., search buttons), missing descriptions for image content (alt text), mislabeled color options, and inaccessible online forms for screen reader users. The website also reportedly lacks an accessibility policy or the universal disabled symbol and fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA guidelines.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Nelson Fernandez filed this lawsuit, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

, P.

and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit demonstrates the ongoing legal risk for businesses whose websites are not fully accessible to disabled users under ADA Title III. Such entities face potential lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and mandatory web accessibility remediation to ensure equal access and prevent discrimination.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a luxury goods retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer