Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online clothing and homeware retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 24, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 AANon-Text Content (1.1.1)Info and Relationships (1.3.1)Keyboard Accessibility (2.1.1 & 2.1.2)NameRoleValue (4.1.2)

Case Summary

Windy Lucius has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an online clothing and homeware retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on March 24, 2020. The complaint alleges that the defendant's mobile application is not fully accessible to visually impaired consumers, denying them equal access to its goods and services.

The lawsuit specifically alleges violations of WCAG 2.1 A and AA guidelines. For WCAG 2.1 A, issues include a lack of text alternatives for non-text content (1.1.1), missing programmatic determination of information and relationships where original and sale prices lack context (1.3.1), inaccessible text in a rotating banner preventing keyboard-only access (2.1.1), a keyboard trap where focus gets stuck after prices are announced (2.1.2), and color options lacking accessible names, roles, or values (4.1.2). For WCAG 2.1 AA, the app is cited for using images of text that are unreadable by screen readers (1.4.5), unclear headings and labels where size options are announced generically (2.4.6), and a failure to announce status messages, such as successful cart additions, to screen reader users (4.1.3).

This action highlights the increasing legal risk for businesses operating e-commerce platforms, particularly mobile applications, that fail to comply with ADA Title III requirements for digital accessibility. Companies that do not ensure their apps are fully accessible and independently usable by visually impaired individuals, including proper integration with screen reader software, face potential lawsuits seeking injunctive relief and other damages.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online clothing and homeware retailer accused of?

The retailer's app is accused of WCAG 2.1 A and AA violations including missing text alternatives (1.1.1), lack of context for prices (1.3.1), inaccessible keyboard navigation and traps (2.1.1, 2.1.2), elements without accessible names (4.1.2), images of text unreadable by screen readers (1.4.5), unclear headings/labels (2.4.6), and unannounced status messages (4.1.3).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Plaintiff Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, represented by J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates legal risk for e-commerce businesses, especially those with mobile applications, that do not ensure their digital platforms comply with ADA Title III and WCAG guidelines for accessibility to visually impaired users, potentially leading to injunctive relief and other legal actions.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online clothing and ho.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer