Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online watch retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 24, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 AMissing Alt TextScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureUnlabeled Form Controls

Case Summary

Plaintiff Raymond T. Mahlberg, represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.A., has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on March 25, 2020. The complaint alleges that an online watch retailer's website is not fully or equally accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers, thereby violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The lawsuit specifically details multiple Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 A violations. These include the lack of alt attributes for image elements (F65), missing text or alt attributes for 'a' elements (F89), and improper identification of row and column headers in data tables (F91). Further accessibility barriers involve duplicated alt text leading to screen reader stuttering, button elements containing only images lacking alt attributes (F65), and form controls present with blank or nonexistent labels (2.4.1).

This action highlights the significant legal risks faced by businesses, particularly online retailers, whose digital platforms fail to meet accessibility standards for individuals with disabilities. Companies operating e-commerce websites must ensure ADA Title III and WCAG compliance to mitigate potential lawsuits, safeguard against injunctive relief, and guarantee equitable access to their online services and products for all users.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online watch retailer accused of?

The complaint details several WCAG 2.0 A violations, including missing alt attributes for image and 'a' elements (F65, F89), incorrect data table header identification (F91), duplicated alt text causing screen reader issues, missing alt attributes for image-only buttons (F65), and unlabeled form controls (2.4.1).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Raymond T. Mahlberg, a legally blind individual, filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm ACACIA BARROS, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the legal exposure e-commerce businesses face when their digital platforms are not accessible to individuals with disabilities, potentially leading to injunctions and significant legal costs under ADA Title III.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online watch retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer