Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an Online Women's Fashion and Accessories Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 24, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Interactive Element LabelsMislabeled Image LinksOnline Form Accessibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online women's fashion and accessories retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on March 24, 2020. Represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., the complaint alleges that the retailer's digital platform contains barriers preventing visually disabled individuals from accessing its services.

The lawsuit specifies several WCAG violations, including menu drop-down options not labeled for screen reader integration, sliders not labeled for screen reader integration, mislabeled image links, and quantity options not labeled for screen reader integration. Additionally, the website is alleged to lack prompting information for online forms and generally fails to meet Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA or higher. These barriers deny equal access to services like locating physical stores, purchasing merchandise, and signing up for promotions.

This action highlights the ongoing legal risk for businesses operating e-commerce websites that do not adhere to digital accessibility standards under ADA Title III. Companies in the retail sector must ensure their online platforms are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, providing effective communication and equal enjoyment of goods and services, or face potential declaratory judgments and injunctive relief.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion and accessories retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of having menu drop-down options not labeled for screen reader integration, sliders not labeled for screen reader integration, mislabeled image links, and quantity options not labeled for screen reader integration. It also lacks prompting information for online forms and fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit demonstrates the legal risk for e-commerce businesses that fail to maintain ADA-compliant websites. It underscores the necessity for online platforms to provide accessible features for visually disabled users, or face litigation seeking injunctive relief and declarations of non-compliance.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an Online Women's Fashion.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer