Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online luxury accessories retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 24, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation FailureLabeled Form Elements

Case Summary

Plaintiff Nelson Fernandez has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on March 24, 2020, against an online luxury accessories retailer. The complaint alleges that the retailer's website fails to provide full and equal access to individuals with disabilities, in violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The lawsuit specifically details several critical WCAG violations, including content not presented in a way without losing information, menu drop-down and quick view options not labeled for screen reader integration, and inconsistent site interfacing with screen readers. Furthermore, the website allegedly lacks prompting information for online forms, an accessibility notice or policy, and the universal disabled symbol for accessibility facts. It is also claimed that the website does not meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher standards and fails to incorporate basic components like alt-text for graphics and keyboard operability for all functions.

This litigation highlights the significant legal exposure for any online platform that does not proactively ensure its digital properties are fully accessible to disabled users. Businesses operating e-commerce websites and retail chains, particularly those with a nexus between online services and physical locations, must adhere to ADA Title III requirements for web accessibility to avoid similar lawsuits and ensure equitable access for all customers.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online luxury accessories retailer accused of?

The online retailer is accused of content not being presented without losing information, menu drop-down and quick view options not being labeled for screen readers, inconsistent site interfacing with screen readers, and lacking prompting information for online forms. Additionally, there is no accessibility notice, policy, or universal disabled symbol, and the website fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards, specifically regarding alt-text for graphics and full keyboard functionality.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by Nelson Fernandez, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

, P.

and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for any business that operates an e-commerce website, particularly those with a direct connection to physical retail stores, if their digital platforms are not accessible to individuals with disabilities, potentially violating ADA Title III and leading to similar litigation.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online luxury accessor.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer