Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Eyewear and Clothing Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed April 1, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 A F65WCAG 2.0 A 4.1.1WCAG 2.0 A H71WCAG 2.0 A F68WCAG 2.0 A 4.1.2

Case Summary

Plaintiff Raymond T. Mahlberg, represented by Acacia Barros, P.A., has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on April 1, 2020. The complaint alleges that an online eyewear and clothing retailer's website is not fully accessible to visually impaired consumers, thereby violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The complaint specifically details several WCAG 2.0 Level A violations that prevent effective communication for screen reader users. These include missing alt attributes for image elements (F65), duplicate element IDs (4.1.1), missing legend elements for fieldsets (H71), invalid `aria-labelledby` attribute references (F68), and blank label elements (4.1.2). Additionally, the website is alleged to have empty headings and text fields that cause confusion for users relying on keyboard navigation.

This legal action underscores the significant risk for other online eyewear and clothing retailers and similar e-commerce businesses that fail to provide accessible digital platforms. Such businesses may face similar lawsuits seeking permanent injunctive relief, attorneys' fees, and costs for failing to comply with ADA Title III requirements, highlighting the necessity of ensuring full and equal access for all users.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online eyewear and clothing retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of WCAG 2.0 Level A violations, including missing alt attributes for images (F65), duplicate element IDs (4.1.1), missing legend elements for fieldsets (H71), invalid `aria-labelledby` attribute references (F68), and blank label elements (4.1.2), alongside issues with empty headings and text fields affecting keyboard navigation.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by Raymond T. Mahlberg, represented by Acacia Barros, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for other online retailers in similar industries, as they may face lawsuits demanding injunctive relief, attorneys' fees, and costs if their websites do not comply with ADA Title III accessibility standards for disabled users.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Eyewear and Clo.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer