Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Eyewear Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed April 14, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAMislabeled LinksScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Alt TextForm Accessibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff NELSON FERNANDEZ initiated an ADA Title III lawsuit against an eyewear retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on April 14, 2020. Mr. Fernandez, who is visually and physically disabled, alleges that the retailer's website is inaccessible, preventing him from fully engaging with its services and information.

The complaint specifically details several WCAG violations, including mislabeled links, menu drop-down options not labeled for screen readers, empty links, site design that sacrifices screen reader functionality, missing descriptions for image content, and a lack of prompting information for online forms. These barriers render the eyewear retailer's website non-compliant with WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards, effectively denying visually impaired users equal access to information about products, store locations, and promotions.

This case highlights the significant legal risk for any business operating a public-facing website, particularly those with a nexus to physical stores, if their digital platforms fail to meet ADA Title III accessibility requirements. Non-compliance can lead to demands for injunctive relief to remediate the website, attorney's fees, and exposure to common law claims such as trespass, emphasizing the critical need for comprehensive web accessibility policies and implementation.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this eyewear retailer accused of?

The eyewear retailer is accused of having mislabeled links, site functions like menu drop-down options not labeled for screen readers, empty links, site design that sacrifices screen reader functionality, missing descriptions for image content, and lacking prompting information for online forms.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

NELSON FERNANDEZ filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for businesses with websites that fail to meet ADA Title III and WCAG standards, potentially leading to lawsuits demanding injunctive relief for website remediation, attorney's fees, and damages for related common law claims like trespass.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Eyewear Retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer