Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a luxury apparel and accessories retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed April 23, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAMislabeled Site FunctionsScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation Failure

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, a visually disabled individual, filed a lawsuit against a luxury apparel and accessories retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on April 23, 2020. The plaintiff is represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A. This action seeks declaratory and injunctive relief under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) regarding the inaccessibility of the e-commerce website, which serves as an extension of the physical stores.

The complaint alleges several WCAG violations preventing full and equal access for visually disabled users. These include mislabeled site functions like the shopping cart, menu drop-down options not labeled to integrate with screen readers, missing descriptions for image content, and content not presented without losing information and structure. The website also allegedly lacks prompting information for filling out online forms, an accessibility notice or policy, and a universal symbol for the disabled.

This case highlights the legal imperative for online luxury fashion retailers and similar e-commerce businesses to ensure their digital platforms comply with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.0 Level AA guidelines. Failure to provide accessible websites risks federal litigation, potential injunctive relief mandating costly accessibility overhauls, and demands for attorney's fees and costs for discriminatory practices that deny disabled individuals equal access to online services and information.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this luxury apparel and accessories retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of mislabeled site functions (e.g., shopping cart), menu drop-down options not labeled for screen reader integration, missing descriptions for image content, and content presentation issues leading to information and structure loss.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for similar businesses of federal lawsuits under ADA Title III, requiring website remediation, potential injunctive relief, and liability for attorney's fees and costs, emphasizing the need for WCAG 2.0 Level AA compliance.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a luxury apparel and acce.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer