Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online jewelry retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed April 23, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AA Non-ComplianceEmpty Form FieldsUnlabeled ImagesScreen Reader IncompatibilityMenu Navigation Accessibility Issues

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an online jewelry retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, dated April 23, 2020. The plaintiff, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., alleges that the defendant's website denies visually disabled individuals full and equal access to its online services and physical store information, violating federal accessibility laws.

The complaint specifically alleges several WCAG violations, including inaccessible online forms (empty forms), unlabeled images, menu drop-down options not labeled to integrate with screen reader software, and content not presented without loss of information. Furthermore, the website reportedly lacks an accessibility notice or policy, preventing disabled users from effectively communicating or accessing support, and does not meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

This legal action highlights the ongoing risks for businesses operating e-commerce websites and digital platforms that fail to implement robust accessibility features. Such businesses could face similar lawsuits for non-compliance with ADA Title III, potentially leading to injunctive relief requiring website modifications, policy changes, and significant legal costs to ensure equal access for all users, including those with visual disabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online jewelry retailer accused of?

The online jewelry retailer is accused of having empty forms, unlabeled images, site function like menu drop-down options not labeled to integrate with screen reader software, and content not presented in a way without losing information. The website also lacks an accessibility notice or policy and does not meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by VICTOR ARIZA, and the plaintiff is represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for other businesses with e-commerce websites and digital platforms that may not be fully accessible to visually disabled users, potentially leading to similar ADA Title III lawsuits, costly remediation efforts, and requirements for implementing accessibility policies and training.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online jewelry retaile.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer