Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an insurance services provider

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed May 1, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: The Leal Law Firm, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 AAADA Title III WebsiteMissing Alt TextSemantic Structure IssuesIncorrect Reading Order

Case Summary

Plaintiff Andres Gomez has filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida on May 1, 2020, against an online insurance services provider. The complaint alleges violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), specifically concerning the inaccessibility of the defendant's website to blind and visually impaired consumers using screen reader software. This action seeks a permanent injunction to mandate changes to corporate policies and the elimination of digital access barriers.

The complaint details several specific WCAG 2.0 AA violations, including the absence of text equivalents for non-text elements, failure to convey content meaning and structure beyond visual presentation, inability to programmatically determine correct reading sequence, lack of descriptive web page titles, and images not explained to screen reader users. These barriers reportedly prevent the plaintiff from fully accessing and utilizing the website's services and information.

This lawsuit underscores the significant legal exposure for businesses that operate online platforms without ensuring full accessibility for individuals with disabilities. It highlights the potential for court-ordered remedies, including the retention of accessibility consultants, mandated employee training, periodic automated accessibility audits, end-user testing, and the implementation of ongoing institutional policies to maintain WCAG 2.0 AA compliance.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online insurance services provider accused of?

The online insurance services provider is accused of not providing text equivalents for non-text elements, failing to convey the meaning and structure of content, having an incorrect reading sequence, missing web page titles, and unexplained images for screen reader users.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Andres Gomez filed this lawsuit, represented by The Leal Law Firm, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case illustrates the legal imperative for businesses to ensure their digital platforms comply with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.0 AA guidelines, as non-compliance can lead to federal lawsuits, court-mandated accessibility overhauls, and ongoing oversight.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an insurance services pro.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer