Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Apparel Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed May 4, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 AAWCAG 1.1.1 Non-Text ContentWCAG 2.4.3 Focus OrderWCAG 2.5.3 Label in NameWCAG 1.4.5 Images of Text

Case Summary

Plaintiff Windy Lucius, represented by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC, filed a complaint against an online apparel retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on May 4, 2020. The lawsuit alleges that the defendant's mobile application violates Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., by failing to provide full and equal access to visually impaired users.

The complaint specifies numerous WCAG 2.1 A and AA violations, including unannounced ad content, an inaccessible "Have a Coupon" field, unlabeled product images (announced only as "image 1, image 2, etc."), unlabeled interactive elements (e.g., a "close" button announced as "unprounceable"), incorrect focus order where focus does not shift to new windows (e.g., size chart), unannounced destinations for banner links in New Arrivals, premature closing of the "Add a coupon" promo field when VoiceOver is enabled, size selectors being announced as "unchecked" after selection, input fields requiring multiple swipes and announcements (WCAG 1.3.5), promo details available only to sighted users (WCAG 1.4.5 Images of Text), and an unlabeled "Account" icon announced only as "link" (WCAG 2.4.6, 2.5.3).

This case highlights the critical importance for all online apparel retailers and businesses operating digital platforms to ensure their applications are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Failure to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards can lead to significant legal challenges, emphasizing the need for proactive accessibility audits and remediation to prevent discriminatory practices and potential litigation.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online apparel retailer accused of?

The online apparel retailer is accused of numerous WCAG 2.1 A and AA violations, including inaccessible coupon fields, unlabeled product images and interactive elements, incorrect focus order for pop-up windows, unannounced link destinations, premature closing of interactive fields with screen readers, redundant announcements for selected options, and inaccessible promotional details and account icons.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a significant legal risk for any business operating an online retail app or digital platform that does not ensure its services are fully accessible to visually impaired individuals, potentially leading to ADA Title III discrimination lawsuits.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Apparel Retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer