ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Electronics Repair Service App
Plaintiff's Firm: J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC
Case Summary
Plaintiff Windy Lucius, represented by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC, filed a lawsuit on May 20, 2020, in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, against an electronics repair service provider. The complaint alleges that the mobile application offered by the defendant violates Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act due to numerous accessibility barriers for visually impaired users. This action highlights the ongoing legal scrutiny of digital platforms under federal accessibility laws.
The complaint specifically details several WCAG violations, including issues with WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) where a “Select A Date” field is announced as a text field but is non-functional and a date picker is not announced. WCAG 1.3.2 (Meaningful Sequence) violations are cited due to hidden and offscreen elements being announced, causing confusion, and navigation resetting to the top of the page after selections. The application also fails WCAG 2.4.3 (Focus Order) as screens with options are not announced to screen-reader users, and focus moves to irrelevant content. Furthermore, WCAG 3.3.1 (Error Identification) is violated because onscreen errors are not announced to screen-reader users, and WCAG 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) is compromised as interactive elements like location selection mechanisms do not work for screen readers, and support subcategories are generically labeled as “menu item.”
This legal action underscores the significant risk for companies, especially those in the electronics repair industry, operating mobile applications that are not fully accessible to disabled users. Businesses must proactively ensure their digital services comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards to mitigate potential lawsuits and guarantee equal access for all consumers, including those who rely on assistive technologies like screen readers.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this electronics repair service accused of?
The electronics repair service's app is accused of WCAG 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) for unannounced date pickers and non-functional text fields; WCAG 1.3.2 (Meaningful Sequence) for announcing hidden elements and navigation resets; WCAG 2.4.3 (Focus Order) for unannounced screens and misdirected focus; WCAG 3.3.1 (Error Identification) for unannounced errors; and WCAG 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) for non-functional interactive elements for screen readers and generic menu item labels.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, represented by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.
What legal risk does this create?
This creates a legal risk for other companies operating mobile applications that are not fully compliant with ADA Title III and WCAG guidelines, emphasizing the need for robust digital accessibility to avoid similar litigation.