Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Automotive Parts Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed June 9, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: J. COURTNEY CUNNINGHAM, PLLC

WCAG 1.1.1 Non-Text ContentWCAG 1.3.1 Info and RelationshipsWCAG 2.5.3 Label in NameWCAG 3.3.2 Label or InstructionsWCAG 4.1.2 NameRoleValue

Case Summary

Windy Lucius, represented by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC, has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an automotive parts retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 9, 2020. The complaint alleges that the defendant's mobile application is not fully accessible to and independently usable by visually impaired consumers, thereby violating federal disability rights laws.

The lawsuit specifically cites multiple WCAG violations, including: WCAG 1.1.1 for non-text content (promo images and ad text lacking screen reader announcements), WCAG 1.3.1 for information and relationships (missing required field indicators on forms), WCAG 2.5.3 for label in name (unlabeled bar code icon), WCAG 3.3.2 for label or instructions (unlabeled 'X' close buttons), WCAG 4.1.2 for name, role, value (inaccessible category pages announced as numbers/characters), and WCAG 3.3.3 for error suggestion (unannounced error messages). These barriers prevent blind and visually impaired users from navigating and utilizing the app effectively.

This legal action highlights the ongoing risk for businesses offering mobile applications or digital platforms that are not designed to be compatible with assistive technologies like screen readers. Companies in similar industries face potential lawsuits and injunctive relief demands if their digital properties fail to provide full and equal access to individuals with disabilities, leading to frustration, discrimination, and a denial of services for visually impaired customers.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this automotive parts retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of WCAG 1.1.1 (non-text content without alternatives), WCAG 1.3.1 (missing information on form relationships), WCAG 2.5.3 (unlabeled components), WCAG 3.3.2 (missing labels or instructions for elements), WCAG 4.1.2 (inaccessible interactive elements), and WCAG 3.3.3 (unannounced error messages).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for other businesses if their mobile applications or digital platforms are not accessible to individuals with disabilities, potentially leading to similar lawsuits, injunctive relief, and claims of discrimination.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Automotive Parts Retai.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer