Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online insurance agency

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed July 1, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: The Leal Law Firm, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 AAMissing Alt TextProgrammatic Reading Order FailureMissing Page TitlesScreen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

ANDRES GOMEZ, represented by The Leal Law Firm, P.A., filed a lawsuit against an online insurance agency in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on July 1, 2020. The complaint asserts violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, alleging the insurance provider's website is inaccessible to blind and visually impaired consumers. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to mandate changes to corporate policies and the elimination of digital access barriers on the website, ensuring it remains accessible.

The lawsuit specifically alleges multiple access barriers preventing full and equal access, including the absence of text equivalents for non-text elements and vital information not conveyed beyond visual presentation. Additionally, the complaint states that a correct reading sequence cannot be programmatically determined when content order affects meaning, web pages lack descriptive titles, and images are not explained for screen reader users. These deficiencies render the online platform unusable for individuals relying on assistive technologies.

This case highlights the significant legal risks that businesses operating online platforms face under ADA Title III if their websites are not designed to be fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Companies that fail to implement and maintain accessibility standards, such as WCAG 2.0 AA, risk lawsuits, costly injunctions, and mandatory policy changes to ensure ongoing compliance, underscoring the necessity of proactive digital accessibility measures.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online insurance agency accused of?

The online insurance agency is accused of lacking text equivalents for non-text elements, failing to convey information beyond visual presentation, having an indeterminable reading sequence when content order matters, missing descriptive web page titles, and not explaining images for screen reader users.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

ANDRES GOMEZ filed this lawsuit, represented by The Leal Law Firm, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the legal risk for businesses whose digital platforms are not accessible to disabled individuals, potentially leading to lawsuits, court-ordered injunctions, and requirements for ongoing accessibility audits and employee training to ensure ADA compliance.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online insurance agenc.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer