Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Restaurant Chain

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed July 7, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureMissing Alt TextUnlabeled Buttons

Case Summary

Plaintiff, VICTOR ARIZA, filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit on July 7, 2020, in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida. The complaint was filed through his legal representation, RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A., against an online restaurant chain operating multiple locations.

The complaint alleges several WCAG violations, including inconsistent site interfacing with screen reader software, improperly labeled navigation buttons such as 'next/previous', content not presented without information loss, site information like happy hour days and times not properly labeled, and a lack of indication if "Order Online" opens a new page. The plaintiff, who is visually disabled, experienced difficulties accessing the e-commerce website to utilize its services, purchase food and merchandise, and sign up for offers, thus being denied full and equal enjoyment.

This case underscores significant legal risks for businesses operating e-commerce websites that fail to provide full and equal access to visually disabled individuals. Companies with online platforms must ensure their digital content, services, and functionalities are fully compatible with assistive technologies like screen readers to comply with ADA Title III and avoid potential discrimination claims.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online restaurant chain accused of?

The online restaurant chain is accused of inconsistent site interfacing with screen readers, improperly labeled next/previous buttons, content presented with information loss, unlabeled site information such as happy hour days and times, and failing to indicate if "Order Online" opens a new page.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for other businesses with e-commerce websites, emphasizing the need for robust digital accessibility to ensure compliance with ADA Title III and prevent lawsuits related to screen reader incompatibility and other access barriers for disabled users.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Restaurant Chain. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer