Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a spa and massage franchise

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed July 9, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

Mislabeled Homepage LinkImproperly Labeled Site InformationMissing Image DescriptionsScreen Reader IncompatibilityWCAG 2.0 Level AA

Case Summary

Plaintiff NELSON FERNANDEZ has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on July 9th, 2020, through his attorneys Roderick V. Hannah, ESQ., P.A., and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.A., against a nationwide chain of spas. The complaint alleges that the spa and massage franchise's website is not fully accessible to visually disabled individuals, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The lawsuit details several specific accessibility barriers on the defendant's website, including mislabeled homepage links, improperly labeled site information (such as hours of operation and phone numbers), missing descriptions for image content, and content not presented in a way that avoids information loss. Furthermore, the website reportedly lacks prompting information for visually disabled users to fill out online forms and does not offer or include the universal symbol for the disabled to access accessibility information. The complaint also asserts that the website does not meet Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA or higher versions.

This legal action highlights the critical importance for similar businesses, particularly those operating nationwide chains with online platforms that serve as extensions of their physical locations, to ensure their websites are fully accessible to all users, including those with visual disabilities. Failure to implement effective communication through auxiliary aids and services on digital platforms can lead to significant legal challenges under the ADA Title III, potentially requiring extensive remediation, policy changes, and financial implications.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this spa and massage franchise accused of?

This spa and massage franchise is accused of having a mislabeled homepage link, improperly labeled site information, missing descriptions for image content, content not presented without losing information, and lacking prompting information for visually disabled users to fill out online forms. The website also reportedly lacks an "accessibility" notice or policy and does not meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Nelson Fernandez filed this lawsuit, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, ES

, P.

, and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit creates a legal risk for businesses, especially those with physical locations and an online presence, that fail to provide accessible websites. It underscores the necessity of adhering to ADA Title III requirements for digital platforms to prevent discrimination against individuals with disabilities, potentially leading to demands for injunctive relief, website remediation, policy implementation, and legal fees.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a spa and massage franchi.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer