Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online cotton garment retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed August 7, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAMislabeled UI ElementsScreen Reader IncompatibilityForm Field Accessibility IssuesADA Title III Website

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online cotton garment retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on August 7, 2020. The plaintiff alleges the digital platform denies him equal access due to various accessibility barriers for visually disabled users employing screen reader software.

The lawsuit outlines several specific WCAG violations, including a mislabeled home page button, site elements such as numbers in pricing or percentages not labeled for screen reader integration, and descriptive text not compatible with screen readers. Additionally, the complaint states that the e-commerce website lacks necessary prompting information for visually disabled individuals to complete online forms and does not feature an accessible notice or policy.

This legal action highlights the significant legal risks for e-commerce businesses and online retailers that fail to ensure their digital platforms comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards. Such non-compliance can lead to federal lawsuits, mandates for extensive website remediation, and the associated costs of legal and technical overhauls.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online cotton garment retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of having a mislabeled home page button, site elements (like numbers in pricing or percentages) not labeled to integrate with screen readers, and text in descriptions not labeled for screen reader integration. The digital platform also allegedly lacks prompting information for visually disabled individuals using screen reader software to fill out forms and an accessibility notice or policy.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This case underscores the legal exposure for e-commerce and retail businesses if their digital platforms are not fully accessible to disabled users, potentially resulting in ADA Title III lawsuits and mandates for costly accessibility overhauls.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online cotton garment .... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer