Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Activewear and Accessories Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed August 11, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAMislabeled ButtonsMislabeled LinksScreen Reader IncompatibilityAccessible Forms

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on August 11, 2020, against an online activewear and accessories retailer. The plaintiff is represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., alleging that the defendant's e-commerce website is inaccessible to visually disabled individuals.

The complaint details several specific WCAG violations, including mislabeled home page buttons, other mislabeled buttons, site information such as product pricing and sale processes not being properly labeled for screen reader integration, and mislabeled links. Furthermore, the e-commerce website allegedly lacks prompting information and necessary accommodations for visually disabled individuals to accurately fill out online forms to purchase merchandise.

This legal action highlights the critical importance for online retailers, particularly those with a physical store presence, to ensure their websites meet ADA Title III accessibility standards, such as WCAG 2.0 Level AA. Failure to address these digital barriers can lead to significant legal liability, requiring businesses to implement comprehensive accessibility modifications to ensure equal access for all customers.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online activewear and accessories retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of having mislabeled home page buttons, other mislabeled buttons, site information (like product pricing and sale processes) not properly labeled for screen reader integration, and mislabeled links. The website also allegedly lacks prompting information and accommodations for filling out online forms.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by VICTOR ARIZA, and the plaintiff is represented by the law firm RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create for similar businesses?

This case demonstrates the legal risk for online activewear and accessories retailers if their digital platforms do not comply with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.0 Level AA guidelines. Non-compliant websites can face lawsuits, requiring expensive remediation and potentially leading to declarations of discrimination.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Activewear and Acc.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer