ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Shoe and Accessory Retailer
Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A., filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on September 4, 2020, against an online shoe and accessory retailer. The complaint seeks declaratory and injunctive relief under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, alleging the defendant's website is inaccessible to visually disabled individuals.
VICTOR ARIZA alleges that the e-commerce website contains pervasive access barriers. These include mislabeled links, missing descriptions for image content, content not presented with proper structure, and site functions like color and quantity options not labeled to integrate with screen readers. The website also reportedly lacks prompting information for online forms and an accessibility notice or policy. Furthermore, the complaint asserts the website does not meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards, fails to include the universal disabled symbol, and lacks essential features like alt-text for graphics and full keyboard operability.
This lawsuit highlights the significant legal risks faced by online retailers that fail to ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals with visual disabilities under ADA Title III. Businesses operating e-commerce websites and physical stores, or those whose websites act as extensions of their physical accommodations, must proactively implement comprehensive accessibility features and policies to avoid similar legal challenges and potential injunctive relief or compensatory damages.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online shoe and accessory retailer accused of?
The retailer is accused of having mislabeled links, missing descriptions for image content, poorly structured content, site functions (like color/quantity options) not labeled for screen readers, lack of prompting information for online forms, absence of an accessibility notice/policy, failure to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA, not displaying a universal disabled symbol, and lacking alt-text for graphics and full keyboard operability.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
This lawsuit was filed by VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES
, P.
and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This creates a legal risk for other online retailers whose websites may not comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards, potentially leading to lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, policy changes, and compensatory damages for inaccessible digital platforms.