Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuit: a fashion retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed October 31, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

Screen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Alt TextInaccessible Form FieldsKeyboard Navigation IssuesPoor Contrast

Case Summary

Plaintiff Aishia Petersen, represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.A., has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, on October 31, 2020. The complaint targets a fashion retailer, alleging that its mobile application fails to comply with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by not providing full and equal access to visually impaired consumers.

The complaint details several critical WCAG violations within the mobile app, including missing product image descriptions, multiple items sharing the same description ID (button), insufficient zoom features for certain items, touch targets that are too small, and poor contrast. Additionally, it alleges that the app's field forms are inaccessible, making it difficult for users to sign in or locate stores, and that error messages are visually displayed but not announced or given keyboard-focus. Crucially, the app's buttons lack proper roles and are not accessible to screen-readers like Voiceover, hindering keyboard-only navigation.

This lawsuit highlights the significant legal risk for businesses that operate digital platforms, such as mobile applications, which are considered extensions of their physical places of public accommodation. Such entities are mandated to ensure their digital offerings are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, or face potential injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and the cost of mandated compliance remediation.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this fashion retailer accused of?

The fashion retailer's mobile app is accused of lacking product image descriptions, having duplicate button IDs, insufficient zoom features, small touch targets, poor contrast, inaccessible form fields for sign-in and store location, error messages that are not announced or keyboard-focused, and buttons that are not accessible to screen-readers like Voiceover.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Aishia Petersen filed this lawsuit, and she is represented by the law firm ACACIA BARROS, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for businesses with mobile applications or digital platforms tied to physical public accommodations, as they may face lawsuits under ADA Title III for failing to provide accessible services to disabled users, leading to potential injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and mandated accessibility improvements.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Mobile App Accessibility Lawsuit: a fashion retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer