Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Asian-themed Restaurant

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed November 6, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

Keyboard Navigation FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Text LabelsForm AccessibilityWCAG 2.0 Level AA

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed a federal lawsuit against an Asian-themed restaurant in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on November 6, 2020. The plaintiff, who is visually disabled and uses screen reader software, alleges that the restaurant's website contains access barriers that prevent full and equal use by disabled individuals, thus violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The complaint specifies several alleged WCAG violations on the restaurant's website, including a telephone number lacking a proper description for screen readers, a missing "skip to content" button, and sections like hours of operation, menu, and gift card purchase links being inaccessible via keyboard. Furthermore, the lawsuit states that the website lacks prompting information for online forms, does not display an accessibility notice or policy, and generally fails to meet Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA.

This action highlights the significant legal risk for similar businesses operating online if their digital platforms are not fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Businesses must ensure their websites comply with ADA Title III and established accessibility guidelines, such as WCAG 2.0 Level AA, to avoid potential litigation and ensure equal access for all users.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this Asian-themed restaurant accused of?

The restaurant's website is accused of having a telephone number without an adequate description, a missing "skip to content" button, keyboard inaccessibility for hours of operation, and keyboard inaccessibility for menu and gift card purchase links. It also lacks prompting information for online forms and an accessibility notice or policy, failing to meet WCAG 2.0 Level A

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by VICTOR ARIZA, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

, P.

and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit demonstrates the significant legal risk for businesses whose websites are not fully accessible to individuals with disabilities under ADA Title III, emphasizing the need for comprehensive digital accessibility compliance to avoid similar litigation.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Asian-themed Restaurant. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer