ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an apparel retailer
Plaintiff's Firm: The Leal Law Firm, P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff Andres Gomez, represented by The Leal Law Firm, P.A., has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on November 19, 2020, against an apparel retailer.
The lawsuit alleges that the defendant's e-commerce website contains digital barriers, making it inaccessible to blind and visually impaired consumers. Specific violations cited include the lack of text equivalents for non-text elements, failure to convey meaning and structure visually for screen readers, incorrect reading sequence determination for content, missing web page titles, and no explanations for images for screen reader users. These alleged issues prevent users from fully accessing information, products, and services, thus failing to comply with WCAG 2.0 AA guidelines.
This action highlights the ongoing legal risk for businesses operating e-commerce websites if their digital platforms fail to meet web accessibility standards under the Americans with Disabilities Act, potentially resulting in demands for permanent injunctions, policy changes, and accessibility audits.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online apparel retailer accused of?
The online apparel retailer is accused of not providing text equivalents for non-text elements, failing to convey meaning and structure of website content for screen readers, incorrect programmatic determination of reading sequence, missing web page titles, and not explaining images to screen reader users.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
Andres Gomez filed this lawsuit, represented by The Leal Law Firm, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This creates a legal risk for businesses with e-commerce websites that do not meet ADA Title III and WCAG 2.0 AA accessibility standards, potentially leading to lawsuits demanding injunctive relief, significant policy modifications, and accessibility audits.