Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Self-Storage Provider

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed November 19, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: The Leal Law Firm, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 AAMissing Alt TextLogical Reading OrderDescriptive Page TitlesSemantic Structure Issues

Case Summary

Andres Gomez, a visually impaired individual, has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an online self-storage provider in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on November 19, 2020. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant's website contains digital access barriers that prevent blind and visually impaired consumers from fully accessing its content, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The complaint specifically details several alleged WCAG 2.0 AA violations: the absence of text equivalents for non-text elements, failure to convey information about content meaning and structure beyond visual presentation, a lack of programmatically determinable reading sequences where content order affects meaning, missing descriptive page titles, and images not explained for screen reader users. These barriers reportedly deny the plaintiff full and equal access to the goods and services offered through the website.

This lawsuit underscores the significant legal risks for businesses, including self-storage companies, whose websites are not accessible to individuals with disabilities. Non-compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.0 AA standards can lead to demands for permanent injunctions, mandatory website modifications, web accessibility training, periodic accessibility audits, and the payment of attorney's fees and litigation costs, as sought by Andres Gomez.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this self-storage provider accused of?

The lawsuit alleges several WCAG violations including a lack of text equivalents for non-text elements, failure to convey information about content meaning and structure beyond visual presentation, incorrect reading sequences when content order affects meaning, missing descriptive page titles, and unexplained images for screen reader programs.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by Andres Gomez, and he is represented by The Leal Law Firm, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case signifies the ongoing legal risk for businesses, particularly those in the self-storage industry, that operate websites not compliant with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.0 AA standards. It underscores the potential for injunctive relief requiring website modifications, accessibility training, periodic audits, and payment of attorneys' fees and costs for inaccessible digital platforms.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Self-Storage Provider. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer