ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Mobile Fashion Retailer
Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff Aishia Petersen has filed a lawsuit against a mobile fashion retailer in the Southern District of Florida on November 30, 2020. The complaint, represented by Acacia Barros, P.A., alleges that the defendant's mobile application is not fully accessible to visually impaired consumers, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The complaint details several specific WCAG violations experienced by the plaintiff when using the mobile application. These include a lack of descriptive labels or audio for most product images, generic "text field" audio for sensitive information like email and password, incorrect audio for interactive elements (e.g., "slash slah" for date of birth, generic numbers for bottom menu icons), unreadable labels on banners and images, inaccessible fields in the "Complete the Order" section, and non-functional navigation despite audio cues. Additionally, the mobile application lacks keyboard-only accessibility and accessible controls for video, with buttons not having proper roles or being accessible to Voiceover (iPhone).
This lawsuit underscores the significant legal risks faced by businesses operating e-commerce mobile applications that fail to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.1 A accessibility standards. Such non-compliance can lead to permanent injunctions, requiring costly modifications, and expose businesses to claims for attorneys' fees and litigation expenses. The case highlights the necessity for digital platforms, especially those integrated with physical places of public accommodation, to provide full and equal access to all individuals, including those with disabilities, to avoid accusations of discrimination and ensure effective communication.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this mobile fashion retailer accused of?
The mobile application is accused of missing descriptive labels/audio for product images, generic "text field" audio for sensitive information (email/password), incorrect audio for interactive elements (date of birth, bottom menu icons), unreadable banner/image labels, inaccessible "Complete the Order" fields, non-functional navigation with audio cues, lack of audio warnings for bag additions, overlapping clickable items, absence of keyboard-only accessibility, and video without accessible controls.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
The lawsuit was filed by Aishia Petersen, represented by the law firm ACACIA BARROS, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This case demonstrates the legal risk for businesses operating digital platforms that are not accessible to individuals with disabilities. Non-compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG standards can result in costly injunctions requiring extensive modifications, and liability for attorneys' fees and litigation expenses.