Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Furniture and Home Accents Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed December 2, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation FailureInaccessible Forms

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an online furniture and home accents retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on December 2, 2020. The complaint asserts that the retailer's website is inaccessible to visually disabled individuals, preventing full and equal enjoyment of its services.

The lawsuit specifically alleges various accessibility barriers, including undescriptive "see details" links, a mislabeled home page button, inaccessible pop-ups, a mislabeled "my account" link, and mislabeled images lacking proper alternative text. Furthermore, the website reportedly lacks prompting information for screen reader users to complete online forms, an explicit accessibility policy, and fails to support full keyboard navigation, thereby not meeting WCAG 2.0 Level AA, 2.1, or higher standards.

This action highlights the significant legal risks faced by businesses operating digital platforms that do not comply with ADA Title III and WCAG guidelines. Companies in the retail sector, particularly those with e-commerce operations, could face similar claims for declaratory and injunctive relief, and potentially compensatory damages, if their websites are not designed to be fully accessible to disabled users.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online furniture and home accents retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of having undescriptive link text, a mislabeled home page button, inaccessible pop-ups, a mislabeled "my account" link, mislabeled images, a lack of prompting information for online forms for screen reader users, the absence of an accessibility policy, and failure to support full keyboard navigation.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates that online retailers face legal exposure under ADA Title III if their websites are not accessible to individuals with disabilities. Failure to provide an accessible digital platform can lead to lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, requiring expensive remediation, and potentially compensatory damages.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Furniture and H.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer