Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online sportswear retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed December 8, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AA Non-ComplianceMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation IssuesScreen Reader IncompatibilityInaccessible Forms/UI Elements

Case Summary

VICTOR ARIZA has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online sportswear retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on December 8, 2020. The plaintiff, who is visually disabled and uses screen reader software, alleges that the defendant's website contains numerous barriers preventing full and equal access.

The complaint specifically details several WCAG violations, including inaccessible contact information, a mislabeled home page button, drop-down options that are not navigable with a keyboard, an inaccessible exit button for pop-up windows, and product images that lack proper labeling. Furthermore, the website is accused of failing to provide prompting information for visually disabled users to complete online forms and not offering an accessibility notice or policy. The lawsuit asserts that the website does not meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher standards.

This case underscores the ongoing legal vulnerability for e-commerce businesses and online retailers whose digital platforms do not comply with ADA Title III and WCAG accessibility guidelines. Similar businesses risk federal lawsuits seeking injunctive relief to mandate website modifications and potential awards for attorney's fees if their websites are found to discriminate against individuals with disabilities by failing to provide equal access.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online sportswear retailer accused of?

The online sportswear retailer is accused of having inaccessible contact information, a mislabeled home page button, drop-down options not navigable with a keyboard, an inaccessible exit button for pop-up windows, product images not properly labeled, and lacking prompting information for online forms. The website also allegedly fails to provide an accessibility notice and does not meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the legal exposure for e-commerce businesses if their websites are not fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, potentially resulting in federal lawsuits seeking costly injunctive relief and attorney's fees under the AD

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online sportswear reta.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer