Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online fly fishing outfitter

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed December 17, 2020

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AA Compliance FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityMislabeled Form FieldsKeyboard Navigation FailureMissing Alt Text

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on December 17, 2020, against an online fly fishing outfitter. The plaintiff is represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

The complaint alleges numerous accessibility barriers on the defendant's e-commerce website, preventing visually disabled users from full and equal access. Specific violations cited include a mislabeled homepage link, a search bar mislabeled as 'scan off space,' a non-fully functional price filter, and an inaccessible customer service link lacking a direct telephone number for assistance. The website is also alleged to lack prompting information for online forms, fail to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards, and miss crucial elements like alt-text for graphics and full keyboard operability, making it incompatible with screen reader software.

This action highlights the ongoing legal risk for online retailers and similar businesses that operate websites not compliant with ADA Title III and Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. Failing to ensure websites are accessible to individuals with disabilities can lead to lawsuits seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, compelling businesses to remediate their digital platforms to prevent discrimination and provide equal access to all users.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fly fishing outfitter accused of?

The defendant's website is accused of having a mislabeled homepage link, a search bar mislabeled as 'scan off space,' a non-fully functional price filter, and an inaccessible customer service link without a telephone number. It also lacks prompting information for online forms and fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards, including missing alt-text for graphics and proper keyboard functionality.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA and is represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This case underscores the legal liability for online businesses that do not ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with visual disabilities, risking ADA Title III lawsuits and court-ordered mandates for comprehensive digital accessibility remediation.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online fly fishing out.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer