Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: A Restaurant Chain

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed January 4, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: The Leal Law Firm, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 AAMissing Alt TextScreen Reader IncompatibilityImproper Reading SequenceMissing Page Titles

Case Summary

ANDRES GOMEZ has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on January 4, 2021, against an online restaurant chain, alleging its website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers. The plaintiff, represented by The Leal Law Firm, P.A., seeks a permanent injunction to mandate changes in the defendant's corporate policies and web technologies to ensure ongoing accessibility under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The complaint specifically details several WCAG violations, including the absence of text equivalents for non-text elements, content meaning and structure not conveyed beyond visual presentation, and incorrect reading sequences where content order affects meaning. Furthermore, web pages lack titles describing their topic or purpose, images are not explained for screen reader users, and there is no accessibility statement outlining a policy to assist disabled users. These issues allegedly prevent blind individuals from fully accessing crucial information like food item descriptions, restaurant locations, and contact details.

This action highlights the significant legal risks faced by businesses operating websites that fail to meet digital accessibility standards under ADA Title III. Other online restaurant services or any public accommodation providing goods and services via a website should ensure their digital platforms are fully compatible with screen reader software and adhere to WCAG 2.0 AA guidelines to avoid similar litigation and ensure equal access for all users.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this restaurant website accused of?

The website is accused of lacking text equivalents for non-text elements, failing to convey content meaning and structure beyond visual presentation, and having incorrect reading sequences. Additionally, web pages reportedly lack descriptive titles, images are not explained for screen reader users, and there is no accessibility statement.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Andres Gomez filed this lawsuit, represented by The Leal Law Firm, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a significant legal risk for other restaurant chains and businesses with websites, demonstrating that failure to provide an accessible digital platform compatible with screen readers can lead to lawsuits under ADA Title III.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: A Restaurant Chain. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer