Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a restaurant chain

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed January 4, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: The Leal Law Firm, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 AAMissing Alt TextSemantic Structure IssuesReading Order IssuesMissing Page TitlesScreen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

Andres Gomez has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against a restaurant chain in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on January 4, 2021. The plaintiff, who is legally blind, alleges that the defendant's online platform contains digital barriers that deny him full and equal access to goods and services, as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The complaint specifies several critical WCAG 2.0 AA violations, including the lack of text equivalents for non-text elements and the conveyance of information about meaning and structure solely through visual presentation. Furthermore, the website is accused of having an incorrect reading sequence that affects content meaning, lacking descriptive page titles, and failing to provide explanations for images to screen reader users. These alleged deficiencies render the online platform incompatible with common screen reading software, hindering access for visually impaired consumers.

This legal action underscores the imperative for all businesses, particularly those operating both online and physical public accommodations, to ensure their digital presence meets accessibility standards. Failure to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.0 AA guidelines can lead to costly litigation, including demands for permanent injunctive relief, significant policy changes, and the requirement to remediate web-based technologies to become and remain accessible to individuals with disabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this restaurant chain accused of?

The restaurant chain is accused of lacking text equivalents for non-text elements, conveying content meaning and structure only visually, having an incorrect reading sequence, missing page titles, and failing to explain images for screen reader users.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Andres Gomez filed this lawsuit, represented by The Leal Law Firm, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for similar businesses of facing ADA Title III lawsuits, potentially leading to court-mandated injunctions, policy changes, and remediation costs to ensure their websites comply with accessibility standards like WCAG 2.0 A

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a restaurant chain. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer