ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An online convenience store platform
Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff Aishia Petersen has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an online convenience store platform in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on January 19, 2021. The complaint, filed by ACACIA BARROS, P.A., alleges that the mobile application provided by the defendant is not fully accessible to visually impaired consumers.
The complaint details several WCAG violations and accessibility barriers within the mobile app. These include first-page featured deals and images lacking screen-reader readable labels, menu bar items (Reward, Deals, Mobile ID, Check In) having no labels readable by Voiceover, multiple deals ("Froster", "Made to Go") sharing the same ID label ("own products"), first-page banners and logos missing audio labels for screen-readers, and signup birthday calendar and gender buttons not working with Voiceover. Additionally, visually displayed error messages in signup are not announced nor given keyboard focus, and mobile app buttons lack proper roles, making them inaccessible to Voiceover.
This legal action highlights the critical importance for businesses operating digital platforms, especially those with a nexus to physical public accommodations, to ensure their mobile applications comply with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.1 A guidelines. Failure to implement appropriate auxiliary aids and services, such as screen-reader compatibility, exposes similar entities to significant legal risks, including demands for permanent injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and costs, to rectify discriminatory practices against individuals with disabilities.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this convenience store platform accused of?
The platform is accused of several WCAG violations, including missing screen-reader labels for featured deals, images, menu bar items, banners, and logos. Additionally, signup fields (birthday calendar, gender buttons) do not work with Voiceover, error messages are not announced, and mobile app buttons lack proper roles, rendering them inaccessible to screen-readers.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
This lawsuit was filed by Aishia Petersen, represented by the law firm ACACIA BARROS, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This creates a legal risk for similar businesses whose mobile applications are not fully accessible to visually impaired users under ADA Title III. Such entities may face lawsuits demanding permanent injunctions, attorney's fees, and costs to implement necessary accessibility modifications and ensure effective communication.