Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Jewelry Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed February 15, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMislabeled UI ElementsInaccessible FormsInaccessible Product Information

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed a lawsuit against an online jewelry retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on February 15, 2021. The complaint, filed by Roderick V. Hannah, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A., alleges violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act due to the inaccessibility of the e-commerce website for visually disabled individuals.

The plaintiff, who uses screen reader software, claims the website presents numerous access barriers. These include mislabeled home page buttons, links identified as "number sign," inaccessible "Contact us" information, mislabeled social media links, and inaccessible product descriptions and prices. The website also reportedly lacks necessary prompting information for online forms, an "accessibility" notice or policy, and fails to meet Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA standards.

This litigation underscores the significant legal risks faced by businesses operating e-commerce websites that do not comply with ADA Title III and WCAG guidelines. Companies in similar industries must ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities to prevent lawsuits and to provide equal access to information, services, and merchandise for all potential customers.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online jewelry retailer accused of?

Mislabeled home page buttons, links mislabeled as "number sign", inaccessible "Contact us" information, mislabeled social media links, inaccessible product descriptions and prices, lack of prompting information for online forms, absence of an "accessibility" policy, and failure to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case highlights the legal liability for businesses whose websites do not adhere to ADA Title III and WCAG accessibility standards, leading to potential lawsuits and demands for significant remedial actions to ensure digital inclusivity.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Jewelry Retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer