Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Apparel Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed February 18, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAMislabeled Home Page ButtonMislabeled Search BarScreen Reader Incompatibility (Product Price)Missing Image Descriptions

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on February 18, 2021, alleging that an online apparel retailer's website contains access barriers preventing visually disabled individuals from full and equal enjoyment of its services.

The complaint specifically alleges violations including a mislabeled home page button, a search text bar mislabeled as "edit scan off space," product prices not labeled for screen reader integration, and missing proper descriptions for product images. Furthermore, the defendant's website is claimed to lack prompting information for filling out online forms, does not meet Web Content Accessibility Guidelines ("WCAG") 2.0 Level AA or higher, and fails to provide effective communication for disabled users through auxiliary aids and services.

This case highlights the ongoing legal risks for businesses operating e-commerce websites that fail to ensure their digital platforms are accessible to individuals with disabilities, potentially leading to injunctive relief and attorney's fees under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Companies with an online presence, especially those with brick-and-mortar stores, must proactively audit and remediate their websites to comply with established accessibility standards to avoid similar litigation.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online apparel retailer accused of?

The online apparel retailer is accused of having a mislabeled home page button, a search text bar mislabeled as "edit scan off space," product prices not labeled for screen reader integration, and missing proper descriptions for product images. The website also reportedly lacks prompting information for online forms and does not meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a significant legal risk for businesses, particularly those in retail with an online presence, demonstrating that non-compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG standards can lead to lawsuits seeking injunctive relief and attorney's fees. It underscores the necessity for proactive website accessibility audits and remediation to prevent discrimination against individuals with disabilities.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Apparel Retaile.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer