Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Women's Clothing Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed February 25, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 AA Compliance FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityMislabeled Form ElementsInaccessible ContentMissing Accessibility Policy

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Esq., P.A., filed a lawsuit on February 25, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The complaint targets an online women's clothing retailer, alleging violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act due to an inaccessible website.

The lawsuit details several critical access barriers on the e-commerce website. Specific allegations include product descriptions that are not properly labeled for screen reader integration, product prices that are inaccessible to screen readers, and a quantity option mislabeled as “edit scan off one selected.” Additionally, the website reportedly lacks essential prompting information for online forms and an 'accessibility' notice or policy that would provide contact information for disabled users. An expert review concluded that the defendant's website fails to meet Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (“WCAG”) 2.0 Level AA.

This case underscores the significant legal exposure for businesses operating digital platforms that do not adhere to ADA Title III and WCAG standards. Non-compliance can lead to federal lawsuits, requiring businesses to implement extensive website modifications and potentially pay attorney fees and costs, highlighting the importance of ensuring full and equal online access for all individuals with disabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online clothing retailer accused of?

The online clothing retailer is accused of product descriptions not labeled for screen reader integration, inaccessible product prices, a quantity option mislabeled as “edit scan off one selected,” lack of prompting information for online forms, and absence of an 'accessibility' notice or policy. The website also fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a significant legal risk for online retailers and similar businesses whose websites do not comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards, potentially leading to lawsuits for discriminatory practices against visually disabled individuals.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Women's Clothing R.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer