ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Footwear and Accessories Retailer
Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on March 2, 2021, against an online footwear and accessories retailer. The complaint alleges violations under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), specifically concerning the accessibility of the defendant's e-commerce website for visually disabled individuals. The lawsuit also includes a claim for trespass related to the defendant's alleged installation of tracking software on the plaintiff's computer without consent.
The complaint details several critical accessibility barriers on the e-commerce website, including inaccessible site functions such as the account link and search button. It further claims that product prices are inaccessible, product images are mislabeled as generic "link" elements, and product information like color is not adequately labeled for screen reader integration. Additionally, the website is alleged to lack necessary prompting information for online forms, a visible accessibility notice or policy, and fails to conform to WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher accessibility guidelines.
This legal action underscores the significant legal risks for businesses, particularly those operating e-commerce websites as extensions of physical stores, if their digital platforms do not fully comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards. Similar online retailers must prioritize comprehensive digital accessibility to mitigate potential lawsuits and ensure equal access for all customers, including those with visual disabilities, while also being mindful of user privacy regarding tracking technologies.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online footwear and accessories retailer accused of?
The lawsuit alleges inaccessible site functions (account link, search button), inaccessible product prices, product images mislabeled as "link," and product information not labeled for screen reader integration. The website also lacks online form prompting and an accessibility policy, failing to meet WCAG 2.0 Level A
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
The lawsuit was filed by VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES
, P.
and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This case highlights the legal risk for online retailers that do not ensure their websites comply with ADA Title III and WCAG accessibility standards. Businesses must ensure their digital platforms provide equal access to disabled users to avoid potential lawsuits and liability.