Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: online apparel and accessories retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 8, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

Screen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Form LabelsMislabeled UI ElementsWCAG 2.0 AA Compliance FailureADA Title III Website

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Esq., P.A., filed a lawsuit against an online apparel and accessories retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on March 8, 2021. The complaint seeks declaratory and injunctive relief under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, alleging discrimination against visually disabled individuals seeking to access the retailer's e-commerce website and physical stores.

The lawsuit details several alleged WCAG violations on the defendant's website, including menu drop-down options not labeled for screen reader integration, mislabeled size and quantity options (e.g., "cap S, cap M..."), product prices lacking screen reader integration, and shipping information not labeled for accessibility. Additionally, the website is alleged to lack prompting information for blind users to accurately fill out online forms and does not meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA accessibility guidelines.

This legal action highlights the critical importance for online retailers and similar e-commerce platforms to ensure their digital properties are fully accessible to individuals with visual disabilities. Businesses that fail to implement essential accessibility features and policies face significant legal risks under the ADA, including potential lawsuits for injunctive relief, compensatory damages for trespass, attorney's fees, and ongoing monitoring requirements to remedy discrimination.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online apparel and accessories retailer accused of?

The online apparel and accessories retailer is accused of several WCAG violations, including menu drop-down options not labeled for screen reader integration, mislabeled size and quantity options, product price not labeled for screen reader integration, and shipping information not labeled for screen reader integration. The website also lacks prompting information for online forms and an accessibility notice.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit creates legal risk for online businesses that fail to provide accessible websites for visually disabled individuals. It highlights the potential for injunctions, compensatory damages, attorney's fees, and mandatory website modifications to ensure ADA compliance, emphasizing the need for robust accessibility policies and implementation of WCAG standards.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: online apparel and access.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer