ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Shoe Retailer
Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A., has filed a federal lawsuit against an online shoe retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on March 9, 2021.
The complaint alleges significant web accessibility barriers for visually disabled users. Specific violations include site information like phone numbers not being properly labeled, the search button not being labeled for screen reader integration, critical site functions such as account and shopping bag being mislabeled as 'link,' and product price and detail not being labeled for screen reader integration. Furthermore, the website reportedly lacks prompting information and accommodations for visually disabled individuals to complete online forms and does not meet Web Content Accessibility Guidelines ('WCAG') 2.0 Level AA or higher.
This lawsuit highlights the ongoing legal risks for e-commerce platforms and online retailers failing to ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, potentially leading to injunctive relief, compensatory damages, and attorney's fees under ADA Title III. Businesses operating similar online services should proactively audit and remediate their digital properties to avoid similar legal challenges and ensure equal access for all users.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online shoe retailer accused of?
The online shoe retailer is accused of several WCAG violations, including site information and phone numbers not being properly labeled, the search button lacking screen reader integration labels, essential site functions like account and shopping bag being mislabeled as 'link,' and product price and detail not being labeled for screen readers. Additionally, the website reportedly lacks accommodations for visually disabled users to fill out online forms and fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
This lawsuit was filed by Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA and is represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES
, P.
and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This case underscores the legal exposure for e-commerce platforms and online retailers that do not provide accessible websites for disabled users. It suggests that such businesses may face claims for injunctive relief, compensatory damages, and attorney's fees under ADA Title III for failing to comply with accessibility standards, prompting others in the industry to ensure their digital properties are fully accessible.