Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: online apparel retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 22, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAMissing Alt Text on ImagesScreen Reader IncompatibilityInaccessible Form ElementsMislabeled Links & Buttons

Case Summary

VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A., filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on March 22, 2021, against an online apparel and merchandise retailer. The plaintiff alleges that the retailer's website is inaccessible to visually disabled individuals, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The complaint details several critical WCAG violations, including a mislabeled homepage link, unlabeled site functions such as sliders, text content not integrated with screen readers, mislabeled images, inaccessible color and size options, and a mislabeled shopping bag. Furthermore, the website reportedly lacks necessary prompting information for visually disabled users to accurately complete online forms and does not feature an accessibility notice or policy, hindering effective communication.

This legal action underscores the significant risk for similar online retailers who fail to ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Non-compliance with ADA Title III can lead to lawsuits, requiring expensive remediation and potentially resulting in court orders mandating comprehensive accessibility policies and ongoing monitoring to prevent discriminatory practices.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online apparel retailer accused of?

The online apparel retailer is accused of having a mislabeled homepage link, unlabeled site functions (like sliders), text not integrated with screen readers, mislabeled images, inaccessible color and size options, a mislabeled shopping bag, and a lack of prompting information for online forms.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by VICTOR ARIZA, and he is represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for other online retailers to face similar ADA Title III lawsuits if their websites are not accessible to individuals with visual disabilities, requiring them to implement significant accessibility modifications and policies.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: online apparel retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer