Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an international jewelry retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 25, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AA FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureMislabeled Links and OptionsMissing Form Labels

Case Summary

VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A., has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on March 25, 2021, against an international jewelry retailer. The complaint alleges that the retailer's e-commerce website fails to provide full and equal access to visually disabled individuals, in violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The lawsuit specifically details several Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) violations, including unlabeled menu drop-down options, mislabeled links (such as homepage, account, and shopping), mislabeled size options, inaccessible 'In-Store Pickup' options with keyboard navigation, and product descriptions that are inaccessible via keyboard navigation. Additionally, the e-commerce website lacks prompting information required for screen reader users to fill out online forms, and it fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher standards.

This case highlights the ongoing legal risks for businesses operating e-commerce websites that do not fully comply with ADA Title III requirements for digital accessibility. Businesses that fail to provide equal access to their online services for visually disabled individuals may face similar lawsuits, necessitating costly remediation efforts and legal defense.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online jewelry retailer accused of?

Unlabeled menu drop-down options, mislabeled links (homepage, account, shopping), mislabeled size options, inaccessible 'In-Store Pickup' option with keyboard navigation, inaccessible product descriptions with keyboard navigation, and lacking prompting information for online forms for screen reader users. The website also fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

E-commerce platforms and online retailers risk ADA Title III lawsuits if their websites are not fully accessible to visually disabled users, potentially leading to injunctive relief, legal fees, and mandated accessibility overhauls.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an international jewelry .... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer