Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online beauty supply retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 26, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMislabeled Form ElementsKeyboard Navigation FailureMissing Alt Text

Case Summary

Plaintiff NELSON FERNANDEZ has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on March 26, 2021, against an online beauty supply retailer. The complaint alleges that the retailer's website contains barriers that prevent visually disabled individuals from accessing its services, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title III.

The alleged WCAG violations include a mislabeled home page button, mislabeled product and "shop now" links, inaccessible product prices and descriptions within the shopping cart to screen readers, and a general lack of prompting information for online forms. Furthermore, the website reportedly lacks an accessibility notice or policy, fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards, and omits essential accessibility features such as alt-text for graphics and full keyboard operability.

This legal action underscores the critical importance for online retailers to ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Businesses that do not adhere to ADA Title III and WCAG standards risk similar lawsuits, which can result in court-ordered injunctive relief, mandated website modifications, implementation of new accessibility policies, and the potential recovery of the plaintiff's attorney's fees and costs.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online beauty supply retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of having a mislabeled home page button, mislabeled product and "shop now" links, inaccessible product prices and descriptions to screen readers in the shopping cart, and lacking an accessibility notice or policy. The website also fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards, does not include alt-text for graphics, and lacks full keyboard operability.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by NELSON FERNANDEZ, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

Businesses operating websites in this sector are at risk of litigation if their sites fail to provide equal access to individuals with disabilities, potentially leading to court orders for website modifications, policy implementations, and payment of legal fees and costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online beauty supply r.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer