Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online dental service provider

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 28, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: The Leal Law Firm, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 AA Compliance FailureMissing Alt Text for Non-Text ElementsSemantic Structure & Reading Order IssuesMissing Descriptive Page TitlesScreen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff ANDRES GOMEZ has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on March 28, 2021, against an online dental service provider. The complaint alleges that the defendant's website contains digital barriers that prevent blind and visually impaired consumers from accessing its content, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 504 of the Federal Rehabilitation Act.

Specifically, the lawsuit asserts multiple WCAG 2.0 AA violations, including the lack of text equivalents for non-text elements, failure to convey content meaning and structure beyond visual presentation, inability to programmatically determine correct reading sequences when content order affects meaning, absence of descriptive page titles, and un-explained images for screen reader users. These deficiencies create significant digital barriers, denying the plaintiff equal access to services.

This case highlights the ongoing legal risks faced by businesses operating websites that are not fully accessible to individuals with visual impairments. Businesses offering goods and services online, especially those with integrated physical locations, must ensure their digital platforms comply with WCAG 2.0 AA guidelines to avoid potential litigation and ensure equal access for all customers, thereby preventing claims of discrimination under federal disability laws.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online dental service accused of?

The complaint alleges violations including the lack of text equivalents for non-text elements, failure to convey content meaning and structure beyond visual presentation, incorrect programmatic determination of reading sequences, absence of descriptive page titles, and unexplained images for screen reader users.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm is representing the plaintiff?

ANDRES GOMEZ filed this lawsuit, represented by The Leal Law Firm, P.

What legal risk does this create for similar businesses with websites?

This case underscores the necessity for businesses to ensure their websites are accessible to individuals with visual impairments, complying with WCAG 2.0 AA guidelines to avoid discrimination claims under ADA Title III and Section 504 of the Federal Rehabilitation Act.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online dental service .... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer