Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Mattress and Bedding Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed April 6, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAMislabeled Form ElementsKeyboard Navigation InaccessibilityScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Alt Text

Case Summary

Nelson Fernandez has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on April 6, 2021, alleging that an online mattress and bedding retailer's website is not accessible to visually impaired and physically disabled users. The plaintiff claims that the e-commerce website, which serves as an extension of the physical stores, fails to comply with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and its implementing regulations, thereby denying individuals with disabilities equal access to its services, privileges, and advantages.

The complaint outlines several specific accessibility barriers, including a mislabeled home page button, improperly labeled site functions such as filters and search bars, and text associated with live links that is inaccessible via keyboard navigation. Additionally, the website is alleged to lack prompting information for online forms, feature an ineffective accessibility widget and statement, and fail to provide alt-text for graphics, rendering many functions unusable with screen reader software. These issues collectively prevent the website from meeting Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA or higher versions.

This lawsuit underscores the ongoing legal risk for businesses operating online platforms that do not ensure digital accessibility for disabled users. Companies with e-commerce websites or digital presences that act as gateways or extensions of their physical public accommodations face potential litigation under ADA Title III if their platforms are not fully navigable and usable by individuals with visual or other disabilities, requiring prompt remediation to avoid further legal action and ensure compliance.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this mattress and bedding retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of having a mislabeled home page button, improperly labeled site functions (like filters and search bars), inaccessible text for live links via keyboard, lack of prompting information for online forms, an ineffective accessibility widget/statement, absence of a universal disabled symbol, missing alt-text for graphics, and functions not performable via keyboard, all contributing to a failure to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Nelson Fernandez filed this lawsuit, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

, P.

and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for other businesses with online platforms that are extensions of their physical public accommodations, as they may also face ADA Title III lawsuits if their websites are not accessible to individuals with disabilities, requiring them to implement significant accessibility modifications.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Mattress and Bedding Reta.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer