Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online shoe retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed April 8, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Accessible NamesMislabeled ImagesForm Field Accessibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed a federal complaint against an online shoe retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on April 8, 2021. The lawsuit alleges violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), claiming that the defendant's e-commerce website is inaccessible to visually disabled individuals using screen reader software.

The complaint details several specific accessibility barriers on the e-commerce website. These include generic labeling of site functions (e.g., location, account, cart, search) as "link" and "group," mislabeled product images, product prices not integrated with screen readers, limited accessibility for only the first color option, and product details lacking proper labeling for screen reader integration. Furthermore, the website allegedly lacks necessary prompting information for online forms, an accessibility notice or policy, and dedicated accessibility support infrastructure.

This legal action highlights the ongoing risks for businesses, especially those operating e-commerce platforms, that fail to ensure their websites comply with web accessibility standards like WCAG 2.0 Level AA. Companies in the retail sector are particularly vulnerable to litigation if their digital services do not offer full and equal access to all users, underscoring the importance of implementing comprehensive accessibility policies and technical standards.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online shoe retailer accused of?

The online shoe retailer is accused of site functions labeled generically, mislabeled product images, product prices not integrated with screen readers, limited accessibility for only the first color option, and product details not labeled to integrate with screen readers, among other issues.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for e-commerce businesses regarding ADA Title III compliance if their websites contain accessibility barriers, potentially leading to injunctions requiring website modifications and legal costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online shoe retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer