Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online furniture retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed May 28, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Alt Text on Product ImagesDescriptive Link Text FailureInaccessible Form Elements

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., filed a federal complaint on May 28, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida against an online furniture retailer. The lawsuit alleges that the retailer's e-commerce website is inaccessible to visually disabled individuals, violating ADA Title III and the Rehabilitation Act.

The complaint details several critical WCAG violations on the defendant's website, including inaccessible product descriptions and prices, improperly labeled consultants' information, and mislabeled product images. Crucially, important navigation links, such as email, location, my account, and shopping cart, are generically labeled as "link," hindering screen reader users. The website is also accused of lacking prompting information for online forms and a visible accessibility policy or statement.

This case underscores the significant legal risks for e-commerce businesses that fail to ensure their digital platforms comply with web accessibility standards like WCAG 2.0 Level AA. Non-compliance can lead to discrimination lawsuits, demands for costly injunctive relief, and compensatory damages, highlighting the necessity for businesses to audit and remediate their websites to provide equal access for all users.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online furniture retailer accused of?

The online furniture retailer is accused of having inaccessible product descriptions and prices, improperly labeled consultants' information, mislabeled product images, and generic "link" labels for critical navigation elements. Additionally, the website lacks prompting information for online forms and an accessibility notice.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by VICTOR ARIZA, and he is represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This case highlights the legal risk of discrimination claims under ADA Title III and the Rehabilitation Act for e-commerce businesses whose websites are not accessible to visually disabled individuals, potentially leading to court-ordered remedies and financial penalties.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online furniture retai.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer