Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Fashion Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed June 28, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AA Non-ComplianceMislabeled UI ElementsDuplicate Image DescriptionsKeyboard Navigation BarriersMissing Form Labels

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on June 28, 2021, against an online fashion retailer. Roderick V. Hannah, ESQ., P.A. and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.A. represent the plaintiff.

The complaint alleges that the e-commerce website contains significant access barriers for visually disabled individuals using screen reader software. Specific issues include a mislabeled home page button, product images sharing identical descriptions, and an improperly labeled size drop-down selector that is difficult to navigate with a keyboard, only integrating individual letters like "s" for small with the screen reader. Furthermore, the website reportedly lacks necessary prompting information for filling out online forms and does not meet Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA standards.

This legal action highlights the ongoing imperative for businesses, especially those operating e-commerce websites integrated with physical stores, to ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Failure to comply with ADA Title III and the Rehabilitation Act by providing effective communication and equal access can lead to significant legal exposure, including injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and damages, prompting a need for proactive web accessibility audits and remediation for similar businesses.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion retailer accused of?

The retailer's website is accused of having a mislabeled home page button, product images with identical descriptions, an improperly labeled and keyboard-inaccessible size drop-down selector, and lacking prompting information for online forms. The complaint also states the site does not meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, ES

, P.

and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case underscores the legal risk for e-commerce businesses that fail to provide accessible websites for disabled users, potentially leading to lawsuits under ADA Title III and the Rehabilitation Act, demands for injunctive relief, and financial penalties for non-compliance.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Fashion Retaile.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer