Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online designer accessories store

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed July 6, 2021

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMislabeled LinksUnlabeled Dropdown MenusInaccessible Forms

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Esq., P.A. and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.A., filed a lawsuit on July 6, 2021, in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida. The complaint targets an online designer accessories store, alleging its website violates Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 by failing to provide accessible services to visually disabled individuals.

The lawsuit specifies several critical accessibility barriers on the defendant's e-commerce website. These include a mislabeled "return to homepage" link, menu drop-down options that are not labeled for screen reader integration, inaccessible product information such as descriptions and prices, and mislabeled size options. Additionally, the website reportedly lacks necessary prompting information for online forms and an effective accessibility notice, statement, or policy, thereby failing to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher web accessibility standards.

This case underscores the significant legal risks faced by online retailers who do not ensure their digital platforms are accessible to all users. Businesses in similar industries must review and remediate their websites to comply with ADA and Rehabilitation Act requirements, or risk similar litigation, including demands for injunctive relief, website overhauls, the implementation of accessibility policies, and ongoing monitoring and training.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online designer accessories store accused of?

The online store is accused of having a mislabeled "return to homepage" link, unlabeled menu drop-down options for screen readers, inaccessible product information (description and price), mislabeled size options, and a lack of prompting information for online forms, failing to meet WCAG 2.0 Level A

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit. The law firms representing the plaintiff are Roderick V. Hannah, Es

, P.

and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for online retailers of designer accessories and similar e-commerce businesses to face lawsuits under ADA Title III and the Rehabilitation Act if their websites are not fully accessible to disabled users, potentially leading to forced remediation and legal costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online designer access.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer